In a legal move, the American Hotel & Lodging Association (AHLA), along with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas challenging the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) recently implemented “joint-employer” regulation.
The lawsuit argues that the NLRB has violated the National Labor Relations Act, alleging arbitrary and capricious actions in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.
The NLRB’s new joint-employer standard, effective from Dec. 26, mandates hotel brands to engage in collective bargaining with franchised employees, even when they have no direct control over them. Under the previous standard, a company could only be considered a joint employer if it had “substantial direct and immediate control” over a group of employees.
AHLA President & CEO Chip Rogers stated, “The NLRB’s joint-employer regulation is all about coercing businesses to the bargaining table with workers they do not actually employ to increase unionization. To achieve this, the NLRB is intentionally taking a wrecking ball to one of America’s great economic engines – the franchise model – and jeopardizing millions of small-business jobs.”
The lawsuit aims to restore the longstanding rule of law governing joint-employment designation for almost four decades and prevent the potential harm to the franchise business model.
For decades, the definition of a joint employer depended on maintaining “substantial direct and immediate control” over workers’ terms and conditions of employment. AHLA supports the right to form a union and collectively bargain with employers that have direct control over workers, opposing the NLRB’s new rule that establishes indirect or unexercised control as sufficient for joint employer status.
More Stories
Wellness in Travel & Tourism Introduces Groundbreaking Certification for Hotels and Resorts
Radisson Hotel Group Unveils New Brand Identity and Expansion Plans
Alexa for Hospitality: Your Voice-Activated Hotel Assistant